IVP - Strangely Dim - Confessions of a Wild Tongue

April 25, 2007

Confessions of a Wild Tongue

As a writer, I've been accused more than once of being "elliptical." In my defense, though, I think that particular accusation has always come from the same person. Her less elliptical friend chose to describe me with the less charitable label "nuanced nincompoop"--which I suppose is pretty much the same thing.

To be honest, I think I write in an elliptical fashion--that is, I swirl around and around a theme like other things that swirl around and around in the process of completing their work--because that's how I think. I look at any number of problems like some sort of daisy chain of Gordian knots, and I'm enough of a failed Boy Scout that I can't bring myself to take a knife and cut through to the solution; I must untangle these morasses and thus untether myself.

Beyond my own issues, there's a cultural bias toward oversimplification that it's appropriate to resist. As Brian McLaren writes in the foreword to Neil Livingstone's Picturing the Gospel, "the habit of 'boiling things down' or 'putting things in a nutshell' . . . makes certain things clear and accessible, but it can obscure and distort other things." Life, I feel entirely justified in saying, is irreducibly complex, and quite frankly is getting only more so, so to treat it as simple is to be dangerously simplistic.

But there's what goes on in my head, and there's what comes out of my mouth. I went to lunch with my pastor yesterday in an attempt to give some of my inner perplexity some air, and as I listened to myself articulating the complexity of relationships and missions I see in play at our church, I found myself thinking, I sound like an idiot. And then there's the article I wrote about how Batman as a character has oscillated back and forth between serious and silly to match the vicissitudes of American culture; the one bit of reader response I got was "You make no sense."

So as a writer I face this challenge of acknowledging and authentically representing the complexity and nuance present to the human condition, even to celebrate it in artful expression, without wallowing in--and miring my readers in--nincompoopery and ellipticalness.

A friend at IVP reminded me this week that the curmudgeonly godfathers of English style and grammar, William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White, have come across this particular Gordian knot and took a pretty effective whack at it:

There are occasions when obscurity serves a literary yearning, if not a literary purpose. . . . Even to a writer who is being intentionally obscure or wild of tongue we can say, "Be obscure clearly! Be wild of tongue in a way we can understand!" . . . "Be cagey plainly! Be elliptical in a straightforward fashion!"

Well sure, when you put it that way. E. B. White made a talking spider into an icon of maternal comfort in Charlotte's Web and a talking rodent into an icon of adolescent self-discovery in Stuart Little, so I guess he knows how to pull off the impossible. But as for me and my writing, I fear we will continue to, umm, serve a literary yearning.

Posted by Dave Zimmerman at April 25, 2007 8:26 AM Bookmark and Share

Comments

The Elements of Style. Thanks be to Strunk & White.

Comment by: Jonathan Boggs at April 25, 2007 10:31 AM

Well *I* like your writing--but maybe that's because I'm elliptical myself. But anyway, how can you declaim a label like "nuanced nincompoop"? Those sorts of terms don't come along everyday.

Comment by: Jenn at April 25, 2007 7:13 PM

Say it loud, I'm nuanced and I'm proud.

Comment by: Dave at April 26, 2007 8:00 AM

My favorite E. B. White book was always The Trumpet of the Swan. A powerful coming-of-age narrative in which the swan overcomes disability and daunting odds to find his voice (as well as community, identity, vocation and true love). While both Charlotte's Web and Stuart Little are likewise still classics, I think Trumpet of the Swan has additional layers of depth and poignancy that go beyond the cute fuzziness of the others.

Comment by: Al Hsu at April 26, 2007 8:22 AM

I got a boxed set of all three of these books when I was hit by a car at age five. (I broke six ribs and wet my pants.) You're right, Al: the character of the Trumpet of the Swan is quite different--more melancholy, for an older audience, I think. But considering how delicately and poignantly Charlotte's Web, for example, deals with death, I'm not sure cute fuzziness is how I'd describe it.

Comment by: dave at April 26, 2007 11:59 AM

I could never get into Stuart Little. Something about it really bothered me. But Trumpet of the Swan is an all-time favourite.

Comment by: Jenn at April 30, 2007 12:13 PM

Comments are closed for this entry.

Get Email Updates

You'll get an email whenever a new entry is posted to Strangely Dim

Behind the Strangeness

Lisa Rieck is a reader and writer who likes to discuss good ideas over hot drinks and gets inspired by the sky. She takes in all kinds of good ideas as a proofreader for InterVarsity Press.

Rebecca Larson is a writer/designer/creative type who has infiltrated IVP's web department, where she writes and edits online content. She enjoys a good pun and loves the smell of freshly printed books.

David A. Zimmerman is an editor for Likewise Books and a columnist for Burnside Writers Collective. He's written three books, most recently The Parable of the Unexpected Guest. Follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/unexpguest. Find his personal blog at loud-time.com.

Suanne Camfield is a publicist for InterVarsity Press and a freelance writer. She floats ungracefully between work, parenting and writing, and (much to her dismay) finds it impossible to read on a treadmill. She is a member of the Redbud Writers Guild and blogs at The Rough Cut.

Likewise Books from InterVarsity Press explore a thoughtful, active faith lived out in real time in the midst of an emerging culture.

Subscribe to Feeds